There are three primary aspects of generative AI applications that intersect with copyright protection: (1) machine learning with protected works (the input side); (2) the protectability of works
Continue Reading EU AI Act’s Opt-Out Trend May Limit Data Use for Training AI ModelsWouter van Wengen
Wouter van Wengen is a member of the corporate practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Amsterdam office. He focuses his practice on intellectual property law, IT contracts and data protection law. He represents national and international clients in the creative sector, the technology industry, and a variety of other companies.
Wouter holds an LL.M. degree in information law at the University of Amsterdam, and an LL.M. degree in Intellectual Property Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and is a member of the Dutch Bar Association.
Are US-Designed Chairs Without US IP Protection Copyright Protectable in Netherlands and Belgium as Works of Applied Art?
The Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) recently submitted prejudicial questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the EU’s highest court, to clarify the application…
Continue Reading Are US-Designed Chairs Without US IP Protection Copyright Protectable in Netherlands and Belgium as Works of Applied Art?Major Influencers Under the Loupe – Dutch Media Authority Publishes New Policy Rule Effective July 1
Success comes with a price. As of July 1, 2022, influencers with more than 500,000 followers (“Major Influencers”) will be under Dutch Media Authority (Commissariaat van de Media)…
Continue Reading Major Influencers Under the Loupe – Dutch Media Authority Publishes New Policy Rule Effective July 1
Supreme Court (partially) overturns Court of Appeal’s ruling in re Spinnin’ Records v. Martin Garrix
World-famous DJ Martijn Garritsen (known to the wider public as Martin Garrix) has been at odds with Spinnin’ Records since 2015, when he announced he would be leaving the label.
Continue Reading Supreme Court (partially) overturns Court of Appeal’s ruling in re Spinnin’ Records v. Martin Garrix